
3.7/ 5.0
Based on 3 reviews
33% Would Retake
Reviews are 100% anonymous • No account required
Checking...Evaluation Criteria Breakdown
Teaching quality3.7 / 5.0
Grading fairness4.3 / 5.0
Accessibility3.7 / 5.0
Workload3.0 / 5.0
Score Distribution
5 Stars1
4 Stars0
3 Stars2
2 Stars0
1 Star0
Student Feedback & Reviews (3)
Filter Reviews
Statistics
Student Comment
“He is a good teacher. Fair in grading and teaching method is also good. If you keep up with his tasks and study accordingly and practice then you can get good grade as well.”
Teaching quality
5.0
Grading fairness
5.0
Accessibility
5.0
Workload
5.0
Tools for quantitative reasoning (MTH114(
Student Comment
“Behaviour wise he's good. He's fair in grading. But can't teach properly, would explain a simple thing in the most complicated manner. And to top it off the coursework is insane except nothing ever relevant to it appears in the question paper.”
Teaching quality
3.0
Grading fairness
4.0
Accessibility
3.0
Workload
2.0
Tools for quantitative reasoning (MTH114(
Student Comment
“Behaviour wise he's good. He's fair in grading. But can't teach properly, would explain a simple thing in the most complicated manner. And to top it off the coursework is insane except nothing ever relevant to it appears in the question paper.”
Teaching quality
3.0
Grading fairness
4.0
Accessibility
3.0
Workload
2.0