Zeenat Zulfiqar

“not suitable for university level teaching”

“Apne Galti nhi manti bhot zyada Zidi Hain aghr Galt bhe parha rhe ho to nhi manng ge Jo chz paper may mangi inho NY aghr WO bhe likh KR dea tbh bhe marks Ka khabra Nikal dete Hain aghr mark rechk Ka kaho or decrease KR dein ge”

“We didn't learn anything useful actually from mam, this course was about python language and ai algorithms but mam didn't even teach the basics of python but lab tasks and mid project was based on this so we had to use chatgpt for lab work and mam herself says so instead of teaching it. Very unbelievable and unfair marking in quizzes. In short, good in nothing either it's teaching qualities, lectures, workload management or behavior towards students.👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻”

“Narcissist 👎🏻 and teach like shouting continuously.. and never understand your pov like she is always right”

“She is honest with her work and she very strict with rules but if you attend the classes then all is well”

“She dont check quizzes and and paper by herself when we say her to plz recheck our paper she deducts more marks kinda threatening ...She didnt teach us anything regarding lab whixh was essential just came write some tasks on board and asks us to do..thats all and she gives extra marks to many other students in lab 10 10 extra and just to her some students ..i recommend to please give subject to only those teachers who know how to teach what to teach ..also remains fair”

“The teaching was not supportive. The teacher carried personal biases into the classroom. If a student was not favored or had disagreed with her, it impacted how their work was marked. During rechecking, even when students politely asked "Ma'am please recheck, I think this is correct", she agreed but still deducted 2 marks unnecessarily each time. Because of this, students avoided asking for rechecks. Quizzes and workload were also not managed well. Overall, I had a very bad experience with the teaching and marking.”